This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.


For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.

Search found 1125 matches

by simo
Tue Oct 07, 2025 6:25 am
Forum: Script Support & Releases
Topic: Banmask proc for dalnet
Replies: 0
Views: 755

Banmask proc for dalnet

Proper banmask setting for dalnet in 1 proc for all your ban settings in your scripts And you can use this when u need to set a ban on someone in a proc Example: ########################## ## Proc for the banmask ## ########################## proc BanMsk {uhost} { if {[string match -nocase "*@*...
by simo
Sun Oct 05, 2025 11:39 am
Forum: Scripting Help
Topic: check blacklisted channels after 5 minutes after joining channel
Replies: 0
Views: 856

check blacklisted channels after 5 minutes after joining channel

greetings , the idea is to store each nick on join in a list after a check for not being admin ops halfops and such than to add in a list to send to a proc to do whois on all the stored nicks after like 5 minutes to check for blacklisted channels and clear all checked nicks from the stored list im n...
by simo
Fri Aug 08, 2025 11:58 pm
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Stacking autovoice with delay.
Replies: 3
Views: 5902

Re: Stacking autovoice with delay.

Thanks for your reply Arnold but that will voice each joining nick with delay only as well and won't stack the voice modes as each joining nick has a separate timer
by simo
Sat Jul 26, 2025 2:57 pm
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Stacking autovoice with delay.
Replies: 3
Views: 5902

Stacking autovoice with delay.

greetingz, anyway we can have this stack nicks that need to be autovoice lets say for nicks that join within 5 seconds because current it seems to always voice each nick seperate with +v nick instead of +vvv nick nick nick wich is what we are aiming for. this is what happens now 19:26:18 Joins: NewM...
by simo
Thu May 01, 2025 12:52 pm
Forum: Script Support & Releases
Topic: AutoReop
Replies: 9
Views: 22854

Re: AutoReop

i wasnt sure on what network he will use this and if it has cmode +O in use for users thats why i made sure its lowercase but perhaps its not really needed im not sure.

else he can use :

Code: Select all


bind mode - "#% +o" Re-OP:Me
bind mode - "#% -o" Re-OP:Me 


by simo
Thu May 01, 2025 9:04 am
Forum: Script Support & Releases
Topic: AutoReop
Replies: 9
Views: 22854

Re: AutoReop

try this : # delay time (in minutes) to REOP Bot. set autoopchan 4 bind mode - "#% +[string tolower [string tolower [string toupper [string tolower o]]]]" Re-OP:Me bind mode - "#% -[string tolower [string tolower [string toupper [string tolower o]]]]" Re-OP:Me proc Re-OP:Me {nick...
by simo
Wed Apr 30, 2025 10:23 am
Forum: Script Support & Releases
Topic: AutoReop
Replies: 9
Views: 22854

Re: AutoReop

try this : bind mode - * Re-OP:Me set autoopchan 4 proc Re-OP:Me {nick uhost hand chan mode target} { global botnick autoopchan if {$mode eq "-o" && [isbotnick $target]} { if {[string match -nocase "chanserv" $nick] || [matchattr $hand omn|omn $chan] || [string match -noc...
by simo
Tue Apr 29, 2025 4:52 pm
Forum: Script Support & Releases
Topic: automatic ban cleaner (with a resetter maxbanlist)
Replies: 2
Views: 7941

Re: automatic ban cleaner

you could try and change this line from : if {(([lsearch -exact [string tolower $banlistchans] [string tolower $chan]] != -1) || ($banlistchans == "*")) && ($mode == "+b") && ($numbanlist >= $maxbanlist)} { to : if {(([lsearch -exact [string tolower $banlistchans]...
by simo
Tue Feb 25, 2025 3:14 pm
Forum: Scripting Help
Topic: Bad-Nick script with stack bans.
Replies: 5
Views: 34156

Re: Bad-Nick script with stack bans.

ive been testing this code yesterday and managed to find a fix so in honor of Spike^^ for those that need it i'll post it here # advanced badnick script v. 0.1 by SpiKe^^ # # list of badnicks # set bnik(nicks) [list "suckmy" \ "bobslovr" \ "pregnat" \ "sonofdog&quo...
by simo
Wed Jan 08, 2025 8:38 am
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Deop on idle
Replies: 7
Views: 30680

Re: Deop on idle

so far this is what i can came up with if its proper, except i dont know how to calculate the time between nick was deoped for idle and then opped again again by chanserv before 1 or 2 seconds past to determine it was cause of a higher status than the eggbot Re-Op. bind mode - "#% -o" Chec...
by simo
Tue Jan 07, 2025 3:03 pm
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Deop on idle
Replies: 7
Views: 30680

Re: Deop on idle

thanks for your reply CrazyCat, i rather use chanserv for that to be honest as its more effiecient to deal with channel access list regardless of IP and such.
by simo
Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:14 pm
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Deop on idle
Replies: 7
Views: 30680

Re: Deop on idle

im facing another issue as op status is protected in channel meaning if someone is not on the access list and is opped manually by someone chanserv will deop them, wich could be conflicting with what im trying to do. im not sure if what i want to achieve is doable would you have an example of how it...
by simo
Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:56 am
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Deop on idle
Replies: 7
Views: 30680

Re: Deop on idle

thanks for your reply CrazyCat , i was thinking of adding a flag right after the OP gets Re-Opped again by chanserv to not deop again checking if that flag has been set on that OP except im not sure how to achieve that or if thats doable.
by simo
Sat Jan 04, 2025 3:40 am
Forum: Script Requests
Topic: Deop on idle
Replies: 7
Views: 30680

Deop on idle

Greetings, I'm using a deop on idle tcl on dalnet wich works fine except If the op has higher access than the eggbot He gets opped again by chanserv right after he gets Deopped on idle i was looking for a way (without having to keep adding each exempted nick in the tcl) to not deop Such admins to pr...
by simo
Mon Dec 09, 2024 2:12 pm
Forum: Script Support & Releases
Topic: chanserv.tcl
Replies: 21
Views: 83601

Re: chanserv.tcl

ive tested it on dalnet and it works fine as well.