egghelp/eggheads community

PSYBNC.SYSTEM.HOST1=S=<ip-of-interface-to-listen-to>

Hah! Nice my old sample code...

Ofloo wrote:and that bind !hello is wrapped with a class ..

Just unwrap it then. What you get is the woobie module except that you use "!hello"
For C modules just check the other eggdrop modules - it's really not that hard...

Did you check the woobie module?

@sKy: i did a sample module in C++ a while back just search the forum...

No idea about gseen but maybe checking if there's a chan trigger bound to !seen by using the bind commmand might not hurt...

Actually it has nothing to do with "worst case" scenario. Think about it like that: The core already is a distinct thread. You want to have a second thread access its data. You can neither read nor write its data without lock/guard. Reading might result in reading incomplete data. Writing ...

Uhm honestly I can't see any benefit in trying to do some "new network module". @De Kus: Could you try to explain a bit more in detail what you want and what is not working as expected? Did you mix C/POSIX Sockets & Tcl "buzzwords" in your first post? Anyway if you want to us...

Edited the code (removed the __stdcall). Should work now.

Yes cut the __stdcall, it's not needed.
__stdcall is the calling-convention of the Win32 API it's usually not used on *nix/g++

Only appeared there cause I used cygwin...

Just an idea but maybe using tclperl with XML::XPath works?

Just for info on mysql/windrop module:

I think it could be difficult as windrop is built with Cygwin/GCC.
You'd need a Cygwin/GCC version of the client library of mysql.
The library that ships with mysql for windows is not build with GCC and thus does not work.

No hurry, i'll put my stuff under public domain once i got time to cleanup the code...

See, i'm not the only one

Nevertheless, I think I might change to the "use-tcl-sockets-for-IPC" approach De Kus mentioned.
Just "feels" better than polling some queue once a second.

Actually that's the purpose i'm using it already for.
Using MySQL++ in a separate thread...

Ehhh yes I read it, i even replied in case you didn't notice...

Kappa007 wrote: Yeah, that's also a nice idea to handle that topic.
Didn't even think about that