Is it enough to use the following line from my script to lock a channel (if netbots is loaded of course) ?
Code: Select all
sl_lock $chan "TEXT flood" ${botnet-nick}This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
Using sentinel with another script to lock a channel
Using sentinel with another script to lock a channel
I wrote a script and I need to make it use Sentinel's locking mechanism in order to keep things centralized.
Is it enough to use the following line from my script to lock a channel (if netbots is loaded of course) ?
z_one
Is it enough to use the following line from my script to lock a channel (if netbots is loaded of course) ?
After skimming the code, there's nothing that stands out as a reason against doing this, except that you don't want to use a flood type argument used by sentinel otherwise you won't be able to tell which script triggered it. In any case, I can't guarantee the behaviour will be what you're expecting.
Well, I'll use another flood argument (thx for the hint) 
As for the fact that you cannot give any garantuee, I understand that, and I'll do it at my own risk.
Anyway, as you said, there's nothing that seems to forbid doing that in the code. It's just that I need to centralize the locking process.
z_one
As for the fact that you cannot give any garantuee, I understand that, and I'll do it at my own risk.
Anyway, as you said, there's nothing that seems to forbid doing that in the code. It's just that I need to centralize the locking process.
z_one