bot kick to ops

forever79 · Post by **forever79** » Fri Oct 03, 2003 4:25 pm

plase help me
my bot kicking to ops on channel,
what is the true code ?

bind msgm - * pv_kick

proc pv_kick {nick uhost hand text} {
global botnick spambantime

##  i think u dont need to change anything below 
##  the bot will kickban if someone private message bot said words with "#" , "join" ,"channel" .etc 
##  if u want change please make sure you cannot put "*words*" . "*" or "?" will make the tcl didn`t work

if {[regexp -nocase "" $text] > 0} { 
  foreach kickchan [channels] {
    if {![isop $nick $kickchan] || ![isvoice $nick $kickchan]} {    
      if {[onchan $nick $kickchan]} {   
         set bmask "*!*[string range $uhost [string first "@" $uhost] end]"
         if {![ischanban $bmask $kickchan] || [botisop $kickchan]} {
               set kickmsg "\00312\002\037Cause\037:\002 Mass-Msg/Invite/Adv/Trojan Send\00312"  
               putquick "KICK $kickchan $nick :$kickmsg"
               newchanban $kickchan $bmask $botnick Mass-Msg $spambantime
             }
       }
    }
}
}
}

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Fri Oct 03, 2003 5:14 pm

this script exempts ops and voices from being kicked for private spam, the problem is not from this script.

arcane · Post by **arcane** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 7:41 am

forever79 wrote:
Code: Select all
if {![isop $nick $kickchan] || ![isvoice $nick $kickchan]} { 

change the || to &&. this code only extempts ops who have op AND voice. ops without voice get kicked.

Post by **caesar** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 9:36 am

Actualy no, by changing from || to && will make it test: if the user is oped AND voiced skip it.. the || dose the OR part, not viceversa.

strikelight · Post by **strikelight** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 2:25 pm

caesar wrote:Actualy no, by changing from || to && will make it test: if the user is oped AND voiced skip it.. the || dose the OR part, not viceversa.

Actually, no, you missed the !'s...

It will be, if NOT opped _AND_ NOT voiced, then do the following...

Post by **caesar** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 4:49 pm

And what I've said?

strikelight · Post by **strikelight** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 5:34 pm

caesar wrote:And what I've said?

You did not say the "NOT"'s....

Post by **caesar** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 6:28 pm

|| means or and && and.. I've said if the || is replaced by an && then will be if something AND something then do.. not if something OR something else then do..

It's exactly what you've said that I've said wrong.

strikelight · Post by **strikelight** » Sat Oct 04, 2003 7:36 pm

caesar wrote:|| means or and && and.. I've said if the || is replaced by an && then will be if something AND something then do.. not if something OR something else then do.. It's exactly what you've said that I've said wrong.

poor caesar... maybe you don't understand what "NOT" is...
Again, here is EXACTLY what you said:

Actualy no, by changing from || to && will make it test: if the user is oped AND voiced skip it.. the || dose the OR part, not viceversa.

see the part where you said: if the user is oped AND voiced skip it

that is NOT what it would become... it would become if the user is NOT opped AND NOT voiced then do the following

or if you are determined to say when it won't occur, then it would be:

if the user IS opped OR the user IS voiced then skip it...

Arcane is correct, either way you want to read it.

Post by **caesar** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 1:50 am

Umm.. yes, duno why I haven't seen the ! before them.. mea culpa

strikelight · Post by **strikelight** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 2:06 am

caesar wrote:Umm.. yes, duno why I haven't seen the ! before them.. mea culpa

It's okay, your eyes must be strained from working on a large TCL project, I'm sure

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 5:48 am

I dont know why this whole discussion occured, but what caesar said is correct but explained it in another way.

caesar said: if the user is oped AND voiced skip it
strikelight said: if the user is NOT opped AND NOT voiced then do the following

also, if its && then if the user is oped or voiced then it won't skip it, he must be oped AND voiced in order for the bot to skip it. So I guess || is whats needed ?

strikelight · Post by **strikelight** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 6:09 am

Sir_Fz wrote:I dont know why this whole discussion occured, but what caesar said is correct but explained it in another way.

caesar said: if the user is oped AND voiced skip it
strikelight said: if the user is NOT opped AND NOT voiced then do the following

also, if its && then if the user is oped or voiced then it won't skip it, he must be oped AND voiced in order for the bot to skip it. So I guess || is whats needed ?

OMG NO! NOT AGAIN! I JUST GOT CAESAR TO SEE THE ERROR OF HIS WAYS!! NOT YOU NOW! SIR FZ THAT IS WRONG!@!@##!@#
READ ALL THE COMMENTS I SAID TO CAESAR!!!

I know, typing in caps is annoying, but so is repeating one's self...
heh... oy vay...

Moral of story: Arcane is correct, && is needed.. please someone lock this topic before anyone else gets more confused

Post by **caesar** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 6:21 am

Code: Select all

if {![isop $nick $kickchan] || ![isvoice $nick $kickchan]} {

means:
if $nick is NOT oped in $kickchan OR if $nick is NOT voiced in $kickchan continue with the proc..
the:

Code: Select all

if {![isop $nick $kickchan] && ![isvoice $nick $kickchan]} {

means:
if $nick is NOT oped in $kickchan AND if $nick is NOT voiced in $kickchan continue with the proc..

and yes, I was working on a repeat and on a stats TCL script.

sorry for the confusion I've accidentaly made. My appologies for that.

arcane · Post by **arcane** » Sun Oct 05, 2003 9:05 am

wohooo... of course i'm right. i thought 5 mins about it before posting

egghelp/eggheads community

bot kick to ops

bot kick to ops

Re: bot kick to ops