This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.


For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.

Silence instead of ignore

Requests for complete scripts or modifications/fixes for scripts you didn't write. Response not guaranteed, and no thread bumping!
Post Reply
g
gto
Voice
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:24 pm

Silence instead of ignore

Post by gto »

I need a script to make the eggdrop to use /silence instead of ignore command
User avatar
Alchera
Revered One
Posts: 3344
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Post by Alchera »

Silence?
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM
g
gto
Voice
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:24 pm

Post by gto »

Alchera wrote:Silence?
/silence +zoo

Server side ignore for nickname zoo. Used on dalnet, undernet.
Is more effective than ignore.
m
metroid
Owner
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:46 am

Post by metroid »

silence only blocks PRIVMSG to the bot, not channelmessages.
ignore is therefor infact better, silence also resets when you disconnect and ignore does not.
g
gto
Voice
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:24 pm

Post by gto »

metroid wrote:silence only blocks PRIVMSG to the bot, not channelmessages.
ignore is therefor infact better, silence also resets when you disconnect and ignore does not.
When your bot msg-flooded by 100-150 floodbots ... there is no way to handle it without quits with msg "sendq exceeded" On the channel you simply place a +m or +l (to limit the mass join). I want to use it when my bots flooded by a specific number of floodbots.
m
metroid
Owner
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:46 am

Post by metroid »

AFAIK, silence is limited to 20 masks (atleast on quakenet).

And if you want a spambot protection, i would advice that you make something that checks the amount of messages recieved in the past <number> seconds, if it reaches a certain limit, set silence +*!*@*.
Automatic unsetting it after a few minutes or something.
g
gto
Voice
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:24 pm

Post by gto »

metroid wrote:AFAIK, silence is limited to 20 masks (atleast on quakenet).

And if you want a spambot protection, i would advice that you make something that checks the amount of messages recieved in the past <number> seconds, if it reaches a certain limit, set silence +*!*@*.
Automatic unsetting it after a few minutes or something.
How to do that ?
User avatar
Alchera
Revered One
Posts: 3344
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Post by Alchera »

Bahamut:
SILENCE [+|-<mask>]

Adds or deletes the specified nick!user@host mask to or from your silence list. Masks on the silence list will be unable to send you PRIVMSGs or NOTICEs. If no masks are specified, a list of masks currently in your silence list is returned. The list holds a maximum of 5 masks.
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM
m
metroid
Owner
Posts: 771
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 2:46 am

Post by metroid »

Actually i was wrong, the limit is 15 on quakenet.

And i would suggest you check some other examples on this forum that have something to do with flood protection. I'm sure you can adapt one to do what you want.
User avatar
Alchera
Revered One
Posts: 3344
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 12:42 pm
Location: Ballarat Victoria, Australia
Contact:

Post by Alchera »

I'd seriously consider timed ignores. The use of silence would seem to be a bit limited.
Add [SOLVED] to the thread title if your issue has been.
Search | FAQ | RTM
g
gto
Voice
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:24 pm

Post by gto »

Alchera wrote:I'd seriously consider timed ignores. The use of silence would seem to be a bit limited.
With ignores it is possible to exceed sendq .... so the disconnect it is matter of time.
We dont want our bots to got disconnected ....
A good idea is to change nick when flooded
User avatar
krimson
Halfop
Posts: 86
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 8:12 am

Post by krimson »

or you could combine the two ideeas and use timed silences. this would help in staying under the server's limit and won't exceed sendq
S
Smurff
Voice
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:31 pm

Post by Smurff »

if you do silence + *!*@* it ignores everything for private messages ( private messages botnet flood). if there can be any such script which can perform Silence +|- thing for variable amount of time , it can solve the problem.
Post Reply