Hi All,
I have a small problem..
Today a user was banned because he joined one of the bot's channels with the ident test.
my_bot sets mode: +b *!*est@*.my.isp.nl
I was suprised because this is not a ban I placed.
I understand that it is somekind of feature in Eggdrop but could not find anything on this forum or in my config files about this.
Why does the bot do this?
rgs,
Ronald
This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
Ban on *!*est@*
-
rrbr
I allready did that.
[16:57] .bans all
[16:57] [16:45] #rbr# bans all
[16:57] Global bans: (! = not active on #channel)
[16:57] Channel bans for #channel: (! = not active, * = not placed by bot)
[16:57] (There are no bans, permanent or otherwise.)
As you can see there are no bans, but still if someone joines the chan with the ident *!*est@* they get banned.
rgs,
Ronald
[16:57] .bans all
[16:57] [16:45] #rbr# bans all
[16:57] Global bans: (! = not active on #channel)
[16:57] Channel bans for #channel: (! = not active, * = not placed by bot)
[16:57] (There are no bans, permanent or otherwise.)
As you can see there are no bans, but still if someone joines the chan with the ident *!*est@* they get banned.
rgs,
Ronald
-
pprefect
Two different scenarios here:
1: Channel ban
If it's a channel ban you would need to .console #channel before doing .bans all
2: +k user
The other way to ban people not using +bans is to .chattr them +k (.help whois). With this a users .comment will be the kickmsg. Do a check for +k users (.help match)
1: Channel ban
If it's a channel ban you would need to .console #channel before doing .bans all
2: +k user
The other way to ban people not using +bans is to .chattr them +k (.help whois). With this a users .comment will be the kickmsg. Do a check for +k users (.help match)
-
rrbr
I'm affraid I wasn't clear in my explanation.
The things you guys suggested, I allready checked.
eg:
#rbr# match +k
*** Matching '+k':
HANDLE PASS NOTES FLAGS LAST
--- Found 0 matches.
and:
.console #channel
#rbr# console #channel
Set your console to #channel: mpjkcobxs (msgs, public, joins, kicks/modes, cmds, misc, bots, files, server).
.bans
#rbr# bans
Global bans:
Channel bans for #channel: (* = not placed by bot)
(There are no bans, permanent or otherwise.)
Use '.bans all' to see the total list.
.bans all
#rbr# bans all
Global bans: (! = not active on #channel)
Channel bans for #channel: (! = not active, * = not placed by bot)
(There are no bans, permanent or otherwise.)
rgs,
Ronald
The things you guys suggested, I allready checked.
eg:
#rbr# match +k
*** Matching '+k':
HANDLE PASS NOTES FLAGS LAST
--- Found 0 matches.
and:
.console #channel
#rbr# console #channel
Set your console to #channel: mpjkcobxs (msgs, public, joins, kicks/modes, cmds, misc, bots, files, server).
.bans
#rbr# bans
Global bans:
Channel bans for #channel: (* = not placed by bot)
(There are no bans, permanent or otherwise.)
Use '.bans all' to see the total list.
.bans all
#rbr# bans all
Global bans: (! = not active on #channel)
Channel bans for #channel: (! = not active, * = not placed by bot)
(There are no bans, permanent or otherwise.)
rgs,
Ronald
-
rrbr
1. What kind of bot is it? A precompiled version? What OS are you running?rbr wrote:Just did.
Nothing that should not be there.
Just some entries in
alltools.tcl
autobotchk
botchk
getops-2.2d.tcl
weed
but nothing that refers to a nickname or an ident.
Just don't know where to look for it anymore
rgs.
Ronald
2. Can you list the Tcl's you have loaded?
3. have you done a "grep test *.tcl" , or a "grep +b *.tcl" on all the script files?
-
rrbr
Egghead,
See my replies below.
1. What kind of bot is it? A precompiled version? What OS are you running?
eggdrop v1.6.13+ipv6
2. Can you list the Tcl's you have loaded?
TCL loaded:
topiclock.tcl v2.04P by Sup <temex@iki.fi> additions by Paladinz
Services GetOps v1.0 by benbe <benbe@dprime.net> loaded.
Smiling TCL script by Laurababe loaded.
Userinfo TCL v1.05 by ButchBub, Beldin, Kirk, guppy, Ernst, and Dude loaded for: URL BF GF IRL EMAIL DOB.
netbots.tcl v4.09 by slennox..
3. Just did, see my previous reply.
(Nothing weird found, just the normal files whit lines like: 'if test -d $dir')
rgs,
Ronald
See my replies below.
1. What kind of bot is it? A precompiled version? What OS are you running?
eggdrop v1.6.13+ipv6
2. Can you list the Tcl's you have loaded?
TCL loaded:
topiclock.tcl v2.04P by Sup <temex@iki.fi> additions by Paladinz
Services GetOps v1.0 by benbe <benbe@dprime.net> loaded.
Smiling TCL script by Laurababe loaded.
Userinfo TCL v1.05 by ButchBub, Beldin, Kirk, guppy, Ernst, and Dude loaded for: URL BF GF IRL EMAIL DOB.
netbots.tcl v4.09 by slennox..
3. Just did, see my previous reply.
(Nothing weird found, just the normal files whit lines like: 'if test -d $dir')
rgs,
Ronald
If there are no bans being pushed out by any script, we are back again to either the user having a wrong flag or somewhere in the c-code the ban is set, which seems unlikely.
1. Have you tried ".match *est* all" ?
2. or searching for the user that matched the host of the ban such as ".match *.nl all"?
3. Or check ".match |+k all" to check for channel flags. So far you only checked for the global +k flag.
See if there are any users matching this and then carefully review their flags.
1. Have you tried ".match *est* all" ?
2. or searching for the user that matched the host of the ban such as ".match *.nl all"?
3. Or check ".match |+k all" to check for channel flags. So far you only checked for the global +k flag.
See if there are any users matching this and then carefully review their flags.
-
rrbr
