AllProtection.tcl (Stable: v4.8 / Beta: v4.9b4)

Alchera · Post by **Alchera** » Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:28 am

If this is not being run on eggdrop 1.6.18 then I suggest you upgrade eggdrop and then do the following via DCC:

.ap:reset #chan

... see what happens. I have yet to encounter this error myself.

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:53 pm

AllProtection won't consider 3 consecutive (not equal) lines as repeats. As for the time problem, it can be caused due to changes to date and time on your bot - restart your bot and it should be fixed.

Alchera · Post by **Alchera** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 7:09 pm

Sir_Fz wrote:AllProtection won't consider 3 consecutive (not equal) lines as repeats. As for the time problem, it can be caused due to changes to date and time on your bot - restart your bot and it should be fixed.

That particular user was using eggrop 1.6.17 and after chatting to them on IRC the problem seems to have been fixed [upgraded to 1.6.18].

A suggestion is to have information included specifying that the beta script requires eggdrop 1.6.18 and/or a version check via the script itself.

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:35 pm

You're right, I don't know why I forgot to mention that this version works best with eggdrop1.6.18. But the problem that Zircon faced wasn't due to eggdrop's version, the command is the same on both versions; it was probably a problem from the box as I mentioned before.

Alchera · Post by **Alchera** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 7:35 pm

Sir_Fz wrote:You're right, I don't know why I forgot to mention that this version works best with eggdrop1.6.18. But the problem that Zircon faced wasn't due to eggdrop's version, the command is the same on both versions; it was probably a problem from the box as I mentioned before.

I should mention that Zircon is a French speaker and has a difficult time understanding English correctly.

When they return (on IRC) your post will be translated for him.

PS: Am glad that you agree about the version check.

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:42 am

Alright, I've been working on the script and did a few changes:

Added the ability to add/rem drone exempts via the .ap:add/rem DCC commands.
Fixed an unknown exploit caused by the string2list proc, replaced it with another.
Added 2 extra ban types *!user@* and nick!*@*.
Now you can exempt users from being banned for revolving door if they have specific part messages (set by you for exempting). This is usually used on networks where a user quits with a certain message when registered.

If you have any bug reports or suggestions not mentioned in the above list, it's time for you to speak for I won't be releasing any new version soon.

PS: The modified version has not been released yet, it's loaded on my bot for now.

Domin · Post by **Domin** » Sun Oct 29, 2006 11:21 am

I wouldt like a version/finger checker that couldt ban users if they have a wrong version/finger reply.

kash2k · Post by **kash2k** » Sun Nov 05, 2006 11:18 am

I feel the best thing about the script is its -

Random String checker in nick and ident..

Wonderful work SIr_Fz

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:18 pm

Current TODO list:

### TODO
# * Bad version reply kick.
# * DCC cmd for private flood protection
# * Option to log everyday in a file

This is all I've recieved lately, haven't found the time to implement yet. If you want to add anything to this list, it is time to speak.

Alchera · Post by **Alchera** » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:45 pm

Suggestion:

The "bad" channel bit not only to scan on join but at intervals (user selected) with option for exempt as they presently are.

Users can enter and then join a "bad" channel after and be undetected.

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Mon Nov 13, 2006 7:56 pm

Alchera wrote:Suggestion:

The "bad" channel bit not only to scan on join but at intervals (user selected) with option for exempt as they presently are.

Users can enter and then join a "bad" channel after and be undetected.

Good suggestion, the time interval (in minutes) can be set via DCC within the ap:bchans settings (0 to disable).

* Added to the TODO list.

Domin · Post by **Domin** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:48 am

Is it possible to make it multi bot, so it can interact with other bots on the same botnet, so if one bot is missing another takes over ??
Im thinking a bit like this:

bot1 normaly controls everything, but if bot1 for some reason is missing bot2 automaticly takes over?

Or is that something that shouldt be handled another way ??

Post by **Sir_Fz** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:14 am

This can be implemented, but should take more time than the other options. I'll see what can be done, probably will implement it

thanx for your suggestion.

Domin · Post by **Domin** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 11:29 am

Nice, thanks a lot for such a nice script

K3rN3L_P4nIC · Post by **K3rN3L_P4nIC** » Mon Nov 27, 2006 3:26 am

question: referring clones section of your script

it is possible to add exempts for one or more IPs/hosts?