This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.


For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.

What are your thoughts on us?

Old posts that have not been replied to for several years.
User avatar
Yourname
Master
Posts: 358
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Toronto

Post by Yourname »

lucy wrote:and its only gotten better and better since i've been a customer.
whenever someone asks for references for good shell providers, ive always included sharpnet in the list.
Same with me.. Since the time I've been having a sharpnet account, it all went really great except a couple things I don't even remember. And yeah, sharpnet tops my list of shell providers.

And what I feel is, Sharpnet is devoted to their work, unlike most of the other shell providers who start their shell company as a part-time hobby. And as a result, the admins dont find enuf time to cater to the needs of their customers. Also, you wont find shell providers active on IRC which most of the customers, like me, desire.. and Sharpnet has a good presence.

Other shell providers say we answer email better than IRC questions. And most of the time we either get the replies late, or even sometimes we dont get a reply! Most of the new enthusiastic users always want their account to get activated a.s.a.p, which can easily be done by IRC interaction, and which atleast 60% of the shell-providers are not good at maintaining.

Bottomline, Sharpnet comes out as a topper in my analysis. :D
Dormant egghead.
B
Bever
Voice
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 8:00 pm

Post by Bever »

ppslim wrote:100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)
B
Bever
Voice
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 8:00 pm

Post by Bever »

ppslim wrote:100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)
B
Bever
Voice
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 8:00 pm

Post by Bever »

ppslim wrote:100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)
B
Bever
Voice
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 8:00 pm

Post by Bever »

ppslim wrote:100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)
B
Bever
Voice
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 8:00 pm

Post by Bever »

ppslim wrote:100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.
OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)
B
Bever
Voice
Posts: 31
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 8:00 pm

Post by Bever »

ppslim wrote:100% of standard shell providers, that allow eggdrops, support IPv4. And again, access to IRCnet.

It is IRCnet themselve theat do not support the shell providers.

OK, I'll rephrase that :p

Do you have an I-line for your IPv4 IP-range on an unrestricted IRCNet
server?

Or:

Is there an IRCNet server that is stable (no, irc.stealth.net is not
good enough) and that does not have your whole IPv4 range K-lined?

Preferably the first :-)
Locked