This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
i Want to create the most a netork whit link`s bot
-
CCaDyMaN
i Want to create the most a netork whit link`s bot
Guis .. i whant to create a channel .. whit eggdrop linked .. to create the most and big .. network of eggdrop ......
-
CCaDyMaN
i need help for that
i need help ... for that ... i need people who whant to create that ... 
- Gothic-Angel
- Op
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Sep 23, 2002 9:46 pm
He ius not stating he has an error.Gothic-Angel wrote:Are you sure you have your host set properly, if the bot doesnt reply to you your host is not set right.
connect through telnet and watch what happens when you ctcp chat him, it probably says chat ingnored no access.
He wants to try and create the largest botnet in the world.
What servers do you mean? Shell or IRC?
There are very few shell providers that impliment limitations on botnets. Out of the ones that do, they limit the amount of connections, or how many listening ports can be used.
Those that refuse to allow any connections, other than telnet connections (including dcc) and IRC server connections, are a serious condender for the shredding machine.
As for IRC servers. No , 90% of IRC servers don't allow botnets. However, all the bots do not need to be ont he same irc network, infeact, they don't even need to be on a IRC server.
Beyond that, there is no way to tell, if 300 of the bots on there servers are connected in a botnet. They have no control or vision of this.
The only other option of thought there, is connecting all bots in the one botnet, to one hub. Besides being insane, slow, laggy and frequent timeouts, it's just not the way it should be done.
150 bot botnets run with a minimum of hastle and lagg free.
There are very few shell providers that impliment limitations on botnets. Out of the ones that do, they limit the amount of connections, or how many listening ports can be used.
Those that refuse to allow any connections, other than telnet connections (including dcc) and IRC server connections, are a serious condender for the shredding machine.
As for IRC servers. No , 90% of IRC servers don't allow botnets. However, all the bots do not need to be ont he same irc network, infeact, they don't even need to be on a IRC server.
Beyond that, there is no way to tell, if 300 of the bots on there servers are connected in a botnet. They have no control or vision of this.
The only other option of thought there, is connecting all bots in the one botnet, to one hub. Besides being insane, slow, laggy and frequent timeouts, it's just not the way it should be done.
150 bot botnets run with a minimum of hastle and lagg free.