This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.
For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.
Old posts that have not been replied to for several years.
-
tbonekkt
- Voice
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Post
by tbonekkt »
Here's my situation. When an OP sets a ban through their IRC program, the Bot will automatically unban the ban just set.
Here are the settings I've checked:
+userbans
bounce-bans = 0
What else am I missing?
-
greenbear
- Owner
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 8:00 pm
- Location: Norway
Post
by greenbear »
it should be -userbans
-
tbonekkt
- Voice
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Post
by tbonekkt »
Really? According to the conf file documentation:
# userbans
# Allow bans to be made by users directly? If turned off, the bot
# will require all bans to be made through the bot's console.
Wouldn't that imply that +userbans enables bans to be made by users directly?
Is there a certain flag that is required, besides +o?
-
greenbear
- Owner
- Posts: 733
- Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 8:00 pm
- Location: Norway
Post
by greenbear »
sorry, i misread your question, its +userbans.
make sure your banlist isnt full .. some servers only allow 20 active bans.
-
tbonekkt
- Voice
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Post
by tbonekkt »
In the conf file, I've set:
set max-bans 100
According to the partyline .bans all - there's only 35.
Is there a different setting or similar? Thanks for your help.
-
demond
- Revered One
- Posts: 3073
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:58 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Contact:
Post
by demond »
that op may be banning a protected hostmask (+o in the bot), or some protection botscript you run may be the culprit
-
tbonekkt
- Voice
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Post
by tbonekkt »
Interesting.. so a user that has a *@* hostmask could be causing this?
-
demond
- Revered One
- Posts: 3073
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:58 am
- Location: San Francisco, CA
-
Contact:
Post
by demond »
yep, +o user with lame *@*
-
tbonekkt
- Voice
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm
Post
by tbonekkt »
That did the trick, demond. I deleted the *@* hostmask from the user and everything is working as expected.
Thank you!