This is the new home of the egghelp.org community forum.
All data has been migrated (including user logins/passwords) to a new phpBB version.


For more information, see this announcement post. Click the X in the top right-corner of this box to dismiss this message.

Bot removing user-placed bans

Old posts that have not been replied to for several years.
Locked
t
tbonekkt
Voice
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm

Bot removing user-placed bans

Post by tbonekkt »

Here's my situation. When an OP sets a ban through their IRC program, the Bot will automatically unban the ban just set.

Here are the settings I've checked:

+userbans
bounce-bans = 0

What else am I missing?
g
greenbear
Owner
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by greenbear »

it should be -userbans
t
tbonekkt
Voice
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm

Post by tbonekkt »

Really? According to the conf file documentation:
# userbans
# Allow bans to be made by users directly? If turned off, the bot
# will require all bans to be made through the bot's console.
Wouldn't that imply that +userbans enables bans to be made by users directly?

Is there a certain flag that is required, besides +o?
g
greenbear
Owner
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2001 8:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by greenbear »

sorry, i misread your question, its +userbans.
make sure your banlist isnt full .. some servers only allow 20 active bans.
t
tbonekkt
Voice
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm

Post by tbonekkt »

In the conf file, I've set:

set max-bans 100

According to the partyline .bans all - there's only 35.

Is there a different setting or similar? Thanks for your help.
User avatar
demond
Revered One
Posts: 3073
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:58 am
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

Post by demond »

that op may be banning a protected hostmask (+o in the bot), or some protection botscript you run may be the culprit
t
tbonekkt
Voice
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm

Post by tbonekkt »

Interesting.. so a user that has a *@* hostmask could be causing this?
User avatar
demond
Revered One
Posts: 3073
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 9:58 am
Location: San Francisco, CA
Contact:

Post by demond »

yep, +o user with lame *@*
t
tbonekkt
Voice
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:26 pm

Post by tbonekkt »

That did the trick, demond. I deleted the *@* hostmask from the user and everything is working as expected.

Thank you! :)
Locked